Comparison

GSAP vs Framer Motion

Framer Motion was rebranded to Motion in mid-2025, but 'GSAP vs Framer Motion' is still how most React developers phrase the question. This is the honest comparison, from a team that ships in both. For the current-name version see GSAP vs Motion.

Updated June 2, 2026

Verdict

Where it lands

Pick Framer Motion (now Motion) when you're in a React app and animation supports the UX, its declarative variants, layout animations, and AnimatePresence exits are less code and read like React. Pick GSAP when motion is the product, scroll-driven and pinned sections, multi-element timelines, or the same patterns reused in Vue and vanilla are where ScrollTrigger and gsap.timeline() pull ahead.

Dimensions

By dimension

React idiom

Winner: Framer Motion

Framer Motion (now Motion) is React-first. The motion.div + variants API reads like React. GSAP's useGSAP works well but always reads as 'GSAP inside React' rather than 'React with motion built in'.

Scroll-driven, pinned, scrubbed animation

Winner: GSAP

ScrollTrigger has years of production iteration behind pinning, scrub, and complex scroll choreography. Framer Motion's useScroll handles simpler scroll-linked effects well but doesn't approach ScrollTrigger's depth.

Timeline choreography

Winner: GSAP

gsap.timeline() with the position parameter is the cleanest way to express overlapping, gapped, multi-element sequences. Framer Motion's stagger and sequence APIs handle short sequences; complex choreography favors GSAP.

Layout + exit animations

Winner: Framer Motion

Framer Motion's layout animations and AnimatePresence for exit transitions are first-class and hard to match. GSAP can do both with Flip and manual unmount handling, but Framer Motion's declarative version is less code in React.

Bundle size

Winner: Framer Motion

Framer Motion tree-shakes down for basic usage, and its hybrid engine leans on native browser APIs. GSAP core is around 25kb and imports as a whole. For UI-only animation in a perf-sensitive React app, Framer Motion is usually leaner. Reported full sizes vary (roughly 30kb+ for the full feature set as of 2026).

Cross-framework reuse

Winner: GSAP

GSAP runs in React, Vue, Svelte, and vanilla JS with the same patterns. Framer Motion was React-only historically; the Motion rebrand added Vue and vanilla support, but the deepest ecosystem and docs are still React.

Licensing

Winner: Tie

Both are free and MIT-friendly for commercial use. GSAP became 100% free including all plugins in 3.13 (mid-2024). Motion is MIT licensed.

Difference

How they actually differ

First, the naming: Framer Motion became an independent project and was renamed Motion in mid-2025. The package moved from framer-motion to motion, and the React import is now motion/react. Most of what people call 'Framer Motion' is the same library under the new name.

Framer Motion's strength is declarative React animation: layout animations, exit transitions via AnimatePresence, and gesture handling that feels native to React.

GSAP's strength is scroll, timeline, and cross-framework depth: ScrollTrigger, gsap.timeline(), SplitText, and Flip, with the same patterns reusable outside React.

Pick Framer Motion

When to choose Framer Motion

  • You're building a React app where animation supports UX (dashboards, SaaS, internal tools)
  • You want declarative layout and exit animations with minimal code
  • Gesture-driven interactions (drag, hover, tap) are central
  • Smallest possible bundle for UI-only animation matters
Pick GSAP

When to choose GSAP

  • Scroll-driven motion (pinning, scrub, parallax) is core to the design
  • You need timeline choreography across many elements
  • Text effects (SplitText) or shared-element morphs (Flip) are in scope
  • You want the same animation patterns to work in React, Vue, and vanilla
Where Annnimate sits

Annnimate position

Annnimate is GSAP-only, and ships every component in React, Vue, and HTML/CSS/JS. If you've chosen GSAP, Annnimate gives you production-tuned components without rebuilding them.

If you've chosen Framer Motion / Motion, look at React-native, Motion-based libraries like Aceternity UI, Magic UI, or React Bits, they match that engine. Annnimate's components assume GSAP.

FAQ

Common questions

Is Framer Motion the same as Motion now?
Effectively yes. Framer Motion became an independent project and was renamed Motion in mid-2025. The package is now motion (was framer-motion) and the React import is motion/react. The rebrand also added Vue and vanilla JS support beyond the original React-only library. 'Framer Motion' and 'Motion' refer to the same lineage.
Which is better for a React project, GSAP or Framer Motion?
It depends on what animation is for. If motion supports UX in a React app (transitions, layout, gestures), Framer Motion's declarative API is the more natural fit. If motion is central to the product's identity (scroll-driven brand sites, editorial, award-style work), GSAP's ScrollTrigger and timeline depth win. Many teams use Framer Motion for app UI and reach for GSAP when scroll choreography gets serious.
Can I use both in the same project?
Yes, and some teams do, Framer Motion for component-level UI animation and GSAP for scroll-driven sections. The cost is two animation libraries in the bundle, so weigh it against just picking one. If your scroll work is light, Framer Motion alone may be enough; if it's heavy, GSAP alone usually is.
Is GSAP still paid for commercial use?
No. As of GSAP 3.13 (mid-2024, sponsored by Webflow) GSAP is 100% free for commercial use, including all plugins that used to require a Club GreenSock membership (SplitText, MorphSVG, and the rest). Both GSAP and Framer Motion / Motion are free to use commercially today.
Related comparisons

Other comparisons